Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01509
Original file (BC 2011 01509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01509 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 

 

 1) The Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). 

 

 2) The Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The awards were omitted from his last DD Form 214. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of 
Special Order (SO) GB-130, a Unit Awards letter, his DD Form 
214 and page two of his AF Form 1712, Uniform Military Personnel 
Record. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 30 Jun 73, the applicant was retired from the Regular Air 
Force. He served 20 years, 3 months and 4 days on active duty. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in 
the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at 
Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR notes the applicant’s 
submission of SO GB-130 awarding the PUC to members of the 
6234th Organizational Maintenance Squadron (OMS) with an 
inclusive period of 8 Nov 65 to 8 Apr 66; however, DPSIDR states 
the applicant was assigned to the 388th Field Maintenance 


Squadron (FMS) during this timeframe. The 388thFMS did not earn 
the PUC during his assigned timeframe. 

The complete DPSIDRevaluationis at Exhibit C.

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant again requests correction of his recordsto includethe PUC and AFOUAand provides an AF Form 1098, Personnel Action 
Request.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments is at 
Exhibit E.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existinglaw or regulations.
2.The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3.Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the 
applicant’s request for the AFOUA and PUC. Although the 
applicant states the AFOUA is not listed on his DD Form 214, we 
note that on 27 February 1991, a DD Form 215, Correction to DD 
Form 214,was issued to add the AFOUA with Valor and one Oak LeafCluster. Therefore, it appears this issue has been 
administratively resolved and there is no basis for the Board to 
consider this request. With respect to his request for the PUC,
we note the applicant provides documentation (AF Form 1098)that 
reflects the6234thField Maintenance Squadron (FMS). However, 
the documentation he submitted is not supported by the 
information contained in his military personnel record. As such,
we find the evidence presented insufficient to corroborate his 
claim that he was assigned to the 6234thFMS.We are not 
unmindful or unappreciative of hisservice to the Nation; 
however, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to grant the requested relief.
2


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 7 Feb 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-01509: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Apr 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 18 May 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 May 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 6 Jun 11, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04351

    Original file (BC-2010-04351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 January 2011, AFPC/DPSIDR wrote the applicant stating they were able to verify his entitlement for award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star and the RVNGC w/P while serving with the 366th Munitions Maintenance Squadron, Takhli Air Base, Thailand, from 24 August 1972 to 4 October 1972; and, that his record would be corrected to reflect these awards. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01107

    Original file (BC-2010-01107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) – administratively corrected. He be awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 30 Jun 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01344

    Original file (BC-2009-01344.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to show entitlement to the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and entitlements for time served in direct support of Vietnam. His application has been partially resolved administratively as AFPC/DPSIDR has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) while assigned to the 6200 th FMS and has taken action to correct his records to reflect this entitlement. Only members of the U.S. Armed Forces who meet the criteria established...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01222

    Original file (BC-2011-01222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01222 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1) His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA w/V & 1BOLC), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02828

    Original file (BC-2006-02828.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02828 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Mar 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All ribbons, medals or awards earned while on temporary duty (TDY) in Bein Hoa AB, Vietnam, and the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) earned while stationed in Korat, Thailand, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01816

    Original file (BC-2010-01816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, an individual must meet the following criteria: a) be a member of a unit subject to combat readiness reporting under Joint Chiefs of Staff Publication 6, Volume V (MAJCOMs, Direct Reporting Units, and Forward Operating Units designate qualifying duty positions and units), b) Complete basic and initial training and be formally certified as combat or mission ready in performing the command or unit operational mission. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03697

    Original file (BC-2010-03697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was informed by other military personnel that he is entitled to the requested awards based on his service in Phan Tang Air Base (AB), Republic of Vietnam. DPSIDR states that after a thorough review of the applicant’s military service records and Air Force Pamphlet 900- 2, Unit Decorations, Awards and Campaign Participation Credits, they were unable to verify his entitlement for award of the PUC. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04527

    Original file (BC-2011-04527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V) – administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04645

    Original file (BC 2013 04645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence in the applicant’s submission or his military personnel records that indicates he was assigned to a unit that earned the PUC. The AFOR-LT was authorized on 12 Oct 80, to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the PUC, indicating there is no evidence he was assigned to a unit...